When Police Fatally Shoot Suspects In The Back And There Are No Consequences

Two recent cases of police fatally shooting Black men in the back have shown no signs of progressing toward getting justice for what on the surface appeared to be murder at best and overzealous law enforcement at worst.

Maurice Granton, Jr., the most recent victim of police avoiding any immediate consequences for a questionable shooting, to put it mildly, died last week after officers aimed and then shot into his back as he ran away. His family has disputed police’s claim that a gun allegedly recovered on the scene belonged to Granton and demanded video footage recorded from body and dash cams, to no avail. The officers involved were placed on administrative leave, which all but amounts to a paid vacation. Meanwhile Granton’s family was left to mourn as the police department and local district attorney’s office offered a collective metaphorical shrug.


In Sacramento, the family of Stephon Clark has had to endure a similar fate. Local authorities have resisted charging the officers involved with the deadly shooting, which an autopsy later found that six of the eight shots cops fired entered Clark’s back. The district attorney serving California’s capital city has a lengthy history of not prosecuting police who shoot unarmed Black men, which Clark was at the time of his death in his grandmother’s backyard. Still, Anne Marie Schubert won her primary for re-election last week in a resounding example of job approval from residents who are more than 45 percent white.

Yet, both of those cases have shown no signs of nearing any semblance of closure despite racial profiling being the topic du jour following egregious police activity surrounding everybody from Black Starbucks patrons to Black people barbecuing in public.

The Chicago Police Department’s rich, lengthy legacy of corruption coupled with Schubert’s apparent cozy relationship with the police in Sacramento likely means each case will end in a familiar result: no jail time, and probably not even an indictment, for the offending officers. (While Michael Slager was sent to prison for shooting Walter Scott in the back in South Carolina, he was an exception to what has become a longstanding, unofficial law enforcement rule of not valuing Black lives.)


Officers who kill suspects by shooting them in the back should be, by law, accused criminals, PBS reported in April. Fleeing suspects should be shot at only “in very narrow circumstances,” PBS wrote, citing a 1985 Supreme Court case as the legal basis for its claim.

“In other words,” the report continued, “a police officer who fires at a fleeing man who a moment earlier murdered a convenience store clerk may have reasonable grounds to argue that the shooting was justified. But if that same robber never fired his own weapon, the officer would likely have a much harder argument.”


In the case of Clark and Granton, neither fired a gun. In fact, as mentioned earlier, it was debatable whether Granton had one at all, and the “gun” police suspected Clark had turned out to be a cellphone. But officers policing Black men in particular rarely let proper protocol affect the strong implicit bias toward African-Americans that police training typically reinforces among recruits, whether it be subliminal or otherwise.

Yet here we are, in the 12th week since Clark’s execution, and there have been no charges filed. For Granton, it’s only week 2, but if history was any indication, there’s no reason to expect charges in his case anytime soon, or, more accurately, at all.


Hundreds of People Fatally Shot By Police In 2018 But NFL Bans Players Kneeling

Good Luck! Black Cop Who Shot Unarmed White Woman To Use Same Defense As All Cops

[ione_media_gallery id=”3799192″ overlay=”true”]


Source: Newsone – News

Leave a Reply